| From: | Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Álvaro Hernández <aht(at)8kdata(dot)com>, Vitalii Tymchyshyn <vit(at)tym(dot)im> |
| Subject: | Re: Merge pgjdbc-parent-poms project into pgjdbc please |
| Date: | 2016-01-25 14:38:56 |
| Message-ID: | 6919265.dfu4VPOnlU@nb.usersys.redhat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Monday 25 of January 2016 09:11:51 Dave Cramer wrote:
> >
> >
> > From my experience, 99.9% of projects redistribute the required java
> > libraries.
> > I've never seen cases when the jar files were pulled from PRMs coming
> > with the OS.
> >
> > I wonder if there are live uses of "pgjdbc.rpm".
> >
> >
>
> This is a good question and one for which you should have metrics as the
> latest jar has not been included in the redhat distro for quite some while.
No, we provide postgresql-jdbc. What makes you think this? That's is one
of the reasons why we are here in this discussion.
We always try to be as much up2date with upstream, but we are now behind,
unfortunately.
> How many tickets do you have asking for the jar ?
None, just for the update:
1196445 postgresql-jdbc-9.4-1207 is available
1217395 update maven notation
1222596 postgresql-jdbc should depend on java-headless instead of java
1255374 Incorrect mvn() Provides and pom.xml data
> Are there any other projects which require the jar ?
Answered in separate branch of this thread.
Pavel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2016-01-25 14:40:19 | Re: Merge pgjdbc-parent-poms project into pgjdbc please |
| Previous Message | Pavel Raiskup | 2016-01-25 14:33:18 | Re: Merge pgjdbc-parent-poms project into pgjdbc please |