Re: Merge pgjdbc-parent-poms project into pgjdbc please

On 25 January 2016 at 09:38, Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:

> On Monday 25 of January 2016 09:11:51 Dave Cramer wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > From my experience, 99.9% of projects redistribute the required java
> > > libraries.
> > > I've never seen cases when the jar files were pulled from PRMs coming
> > > with the OS.
> > >
> > > I wonder if there are live uses of "pgjdbc.rpm".
> > >
> > >
> >
> > This is a good question and one for which you should have metrics as the
> > latest jar has not been included in the redhat distro for quite some
> while.
>
> No, we provide postgresql-jdbc. What makes you think this? That's is one
> of the reasons why we are here in this discussion.
>
> We always try to be as much up2date with upstream, but we are now behind,
> unfortunately.
>
> > How many tickets do you have asking for the jar ?
>
> None, just for the update:
>
> 1196445 postgresql-jdbc-9.4-1207 is available
> 1217395 update maven notation
> 1222596 postgresql-jdbc should depend on java-headless instead of java
> 1255374 Incorrect mvn() Provides and pom.xml data
>
> > Are there any other projects which require the jar ?
>
> Answered in separate branch of this thread.
>

Ok, lets just keep moving forward. I've asked OSGI folks I'll report ASAP

Dave Cramer

davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
www.postgresintl.com

>
> Pavel
>
>