| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Inconsistent Japanese name order in v13 contributors list |
| Date: | 2020-09-09 18:42:41 |
| Message-ID: | 67322.1599676961@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2020-Sep-09, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> Using given-name-first order is our consensus?
> That's indeed our historical practice. See previous thread where we've
> discussed this at length,
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20150613231826.GY133018%40postgresql.org#88d245a5cdd2b32e1e3e80fc07eab6f2
> The Economist piece Peter G cited is also relevant.
Right. I think the decree the Economist cites might be sufficient
reason to reopen the discussion, though I surely don't want it to
turn into another long thread.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2020-09-09 18:47:36 | Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-09-09 18:40:41 | Re: WIP: BRIN multi-range indexes |