From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
Cc: | Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Inconsistent Japanese name order in v13 contributors list |
Date: | 2020-09-09 18:27:42 |
Message-ID: | 20200909182742.GA2385@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Sep-09, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On 2020/09/09 14:15, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Attached is a patch to standardize Japanese names as given-name-first
> > in the v13 contributors list as before.
>
> Using given-name-first order is our consensus? I was thinking we have not
> reached that yet and our "vague" consensus was to use the name that each
> contributor prefers, for example the name that used in the email signature, etc.
That's indeed our historical practice. See previous thread where we've
discussed this at length,
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20150613231826.GY133018%40postgresql.org#88d245a5cdd2b32e1e3e80fc07eab6f2
The Economist piece Peter G cited is also relevant.
The commit Peter E cited seems more anecdotical than precedence-setting,
since there was no actual discussion, and whatever little there was was
confined to pgsql-committers.
An easy way to avoid any confusion is to uppercase the family name in
the cases where it goes first.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-09-09 18:29:16 | Re: Remove line length restriction in passwordFromFile() |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-09-09 18:21:30 | Re: shared-memory based stats collector |