Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Fedorov <petr(dot)fedorov(at)phystech(dot)edu>
Subject: Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch
Date: 2020-09-09 18:47:36
Message-ID: 38fc499a-ae52-efb6-aad6-82f812d6782d@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On 2020-09-09 15:38, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> and a few
>>> more calls of int8_numeric that could be converted. I think the
>>> attached updated version is committable, and I'd recommend going
>>> ahead with that regardless of the rest of this. I hadn't realized
>>> how many random calls of int8_numeric and int4_numeric we'd grown,
>>> but there are a lot, so this is nice cleanup.
>
>> Yes, please go ahead with it.
>
> It's your patch, I figured you'd want to commit it.

ok done

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Bug reporting form 2020-09-10 08:45:19 BUG #16614: Stale temporary objects makes vacuum ineffective when 1 million transactions remain
Previous Message Stephane Desnault 2020-09-09 18:05:11 Re: BUG #16613: Built in suppress_redundant_updates_trigger() trigger not supressing redundant updates

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2020-09-09 19:26:20 Re: SIGQUIT handling, redux
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-09-09 18:42:41 Re: Inconsistent Japanese name order in v13 contributors list