Re: Reg: Size difference

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Vinay Oli <olivinay541(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reg: Size difference
Date: 2024-09-14 17:29:06
Message-ID: 65a64890-17b9-45ec-8ac4-afb61794806c@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 9/14/24 10:19, Vinay Oli wrote:
> Hi Team
>
> I have been using PostgreSQL for the past 6 years. PostgreSQL has
> significantly impacted my life, providing me with great opportunities
> for knowledge and self-development.
>
> I'm currently facing a strange issue with PostgreSQL 15.0. I have a
> primary-standby setup that is in sync, with a replication slot in place.
> There are 18 databases, and one of the databases on the primary side is
> 104 GB, while the same database on the standby side is 216 GB. Both are
> in sync with zero delay.

How are you measuring the size?

If you are measuring on the files system what is the size of the base/
and pg_wal/ sub-directories in the %PG_DATA directoty?

>
> Could this be a bug? If so, has it been resolved in newer releases? If
> it is not a bug, how can this issue be fixed? Is there a solution or any
> supporting documentation available?
>
> WAL and log files are being rotated properly. The issue is with a
> database named services_mfs. On the primary cluster, the services_mfs
> database is 104GB, but on the standby cluster, it is 216GB, even though
> both cluster are in sync. The standby database is only used in case of a
> crash, which is managed by a Patroni cluster with etcd.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Vinay Kumar
>
>
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2024-09-14 17:30:37 Re: Reg: Size difference
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2024-09-14 17:23:31 Re: update faster way