Re: pgsql: Fix union for pgstat message types

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Fix union for pgstat message types
Date: 2019-05-04 15:54:12
Message-ID: 6102.1556985252@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 10:34:52AM +0000, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Fix union for pgstat message types

> Should the tempfile bit be backported? That message was added in 9.2.

It's just cosmetic I think. The main point of having everything in
the union is to make sure the union's size/alignment are sufficient,
but the tempfile message isn't anywhere near creating an issue there.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2019-05-04 17:08:10 Re: pgsql: Fix union for pgstat message types
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2019-05-04 15:48:02 Re: pgsql: Fix union for pgstat message types