Re: Columns of pg_stat_activity

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Columns of pg_stat_activity
Date: 2012-04-11 21:14:51
Message-ID: 6094.1334178891@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:50:43PM +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 11 April 2012 21:46, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Arguably:
>>> backend_start -> session_start
>>> query_start -> statment_start

>> Sounds like a lot of potential breakage to solve something I don't
>> think is a problem. Besides, isn't the door for 9.2 changes now
>> closed and bolted?

We do still have open issues that include such proposed changes,
so I'd say that "too late" isn't a good argument. However ...

> Well, we renamed procpid -> pid and I noticed these others. Not sure if
> it is a win or not, but just asking.

We were talking about renaming columns if we changed their semantics.
I don't think renaming for the sake of a slightly cleaner name will
win us any friends.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2012-04-11 21:25:25 Re: Columns of pg_stat_activity
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2012-04-11 21:11:18 Re: Columns of pg_stat_activity