| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Columns of pg_stat_activity |
| Date: | 2012-04-11 21:25:25 |
| Message-ID: | 20120411212525.GS3379@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:11:18PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> > Should we make any of these changes?
> >>
> >> Sounds like a lot of potential breakage to solve something I don't
> >> think is a problem. Besides, isn't the door for 9.2 changes now
> >> closed and bolted?
> >
> > Well, we renamed procpid -> pid and I noticed these others. Not sure if
> > it is a win or not, but just asking.
>
> We also renamed current_query -> query, but that was mainly because it
> actually changed meaning.
>
> But. Since we already whacked around procpid->pid, yes, if we're ever
> going to change those, now is the time, really.
>
> I think at least backend_start -> session_start would make sense.
>
> Not sure about the other one - what's wrong with query_start?
We consistently use "statement" for commands, not "queries", because
some feel query means SELECT.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-04-11 21:29:48 | Re: Columns of pg_stat_activity |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-04-11 21:14:51 | Re: Columns of pg_stat_activity |