| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Columns of pg_stat_activity |
| Date: | 2012-04-11 21:04:52 |
| Message-ID: | 20120411210452.GQ3379@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:50:43PM +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 11 April 2012 21:46, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > Since we are wacking around pg_stat_activity for 9.2, what do people
> > think about these column names?
> >
> > backend_start | timestamp with time zone |
> > xact_start | timestamp with time zone |
> > query_start | timestamp with time zone |
> >
> > Arguably:
> >
> > backend_start -> session_start
> > query_start -> statment_start
> >
> > Should we make any of these changes?
>
> Sounds like a lot of potential breakage to solve something I don't
> think is a problem. Besides, isn't the door for 9.2 changes now
> closed and bolted?
Well, we renamed procpid -> pid and I noticed these others. Not sure if
it is a win or not, but just asking.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thom Brown | 2012-04-11 21:10:24 | Re: man pages for contrib programs |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-04-11 20:58:10 | Re: man pages for contrib programs |