Re: Columns of pg_stat_activity

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Columns of pg_stat_activity
Date: 2012-04-11 21:04:52
Message-ID: 20120411210452.GQ3379@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:50:43PM +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 11 April 2012 21:46, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > Since we are wacking around pg_stat_activity for 9.2, what do people
> > think about these column names?
> >
> >         backend_start    | timestamp with time zone |
> >         xact_start       | timestamp with time zone |
> >         query_start      | timestamp with time zone |
> >
> > Arguably:
> >
> >        backend_start -> session_start
> >        query_start -> statment_start
> >
> > Should we make any of these changes?
>
> Sounds like a lot of potential breakage to solve something I don't
> think is a problem. Besides, isn't the door for 9.2 changes now
> closed and bolted?

Well, we renamed procpid -> pid and I noticed these others. Not sure if
it is a win or not, but just asking.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thom Brown 2012-04-11 21:10:24 Re: man pages for contrib programs
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-04-11 20:58:10 Re: man pages for contrib programs