Re: small but useful patches for text search

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: small but useful patches for text search
Date: 2009-03-20 17:45:03
Message-ID: 603c8f070903201045v38394c0ehb8e109861ff8bda4@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> This is about the reaction I expected, and is again so far off the mark
> that I will just continue doing what I think is best.

Would you like to explain WHY it's off the mark?

> Why doesn't someone offer to take my mbox file and generate a list from
> that?

A list of what? CVS commit messages that needed to be added to the
release notes? Patches that were committed but need follow-up work?
Patches that were missed and never added to the Wiki? Other
release-related tasks that need to be done?

...Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Eric Thompson 2009-03-20 18:45:22 BUG #4721: All sub-tables incorrectly included in search plan for partitioned table
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-03-20 17:40:30 Re: small but useful patches for text search