Re: small but useful patches for text search

This is about the reaction I expected, and is again so far off the mark
that I will just continue doing what I think is best.

Why doesn't someone offer to take my mbox file and generate a list from
that?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > Robert Treat wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 17 March 2009 09:38:59 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> > You are assuming that only commit-fest work is required to get us to
> >> > beta. ?You might remember the long list of open items I faced in January
> >> > that I have whittled down, but I still have about twenty left.
> >> >
> >>
> >> I think part of the perception of the project sitting around doing nothing
> >> isn't so much that you/tom are doing nothing, but others who were doing
> >> review or coding features are now caught in limbo. One of the things the
> >> commitfest has been successful at is helping delegate code review. Perhaps we
> >> need to take a fresh look at your list of twenty things and see what can be
> >> delegated out to others.
> >
> > Yep, I agree. ?The problem is that last time I put out a list that
> > wasn't clensed I got a lot of compaints so I am only going to put out a
> > list that is 100% accurate, and that will take hours to produce, time I
> > don't have now because I am working on the release notes.
>
> I don't want to be a grump, but this is a false dichotomy. What you
> put out last time was a dump of 700 emails, much of which was
> irrelevant and most of the rest of which was duplicative of itself or
> the CommitFest wiki. Now, it may be true that even if your list was
> 80% accurate, people would still have complained about the other 20%,
> but we don't know that, because the actual list was at best 10%
> accurate, and of course people are going to complain about that.
>
> I personally think that the way pgsql-hackers organizes itself using
> email is completely insane. The only reason that you need to write
> the release notes instead of, say, me, is because the only information
> on what needs to go into them is buried in a thicket of CVS commit
> messages that I am not nearly brave enough to attempt to penetrate. I
> suggested putting them in CVS yesterday; Tom didn't like that, but
> what about a wiki page or a database? grep 'release notes'
> /last/six/months/of/email can't possibly be the best way to do this.
> Given any sort of list to work from, even one that is totally
> disorganized and written in broken English, I can't believe this is
> more than an hour or two of work, and I'd be more than happy to take a
> crack at it (I'm probably not the only one, either).
>
> Similarly, the only reason we don't have a workable TODO list is
> because you're attempting to extract it from a disorganized jumble of
> email after the fact, instead of maintaining it publicly and adding
> and removing items along the way. It might be slightly more work to
> think up a reasonable label for an action item at the time you learn
> about it than to just dump the email in a folder, but I think the time
> you didn't have to spend sorting through it later would more than make
> up for it. Plus then items could be worked on along the way instead
> of waiting until the bitter end when the TODO list materializes and we
> all say "Oh, really?".
>
> ...Robert

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +