| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: small but useful patches for text search |
| Date: | 2009-03-20 17:40:30 |
| Message-ID: | 20090320174030.GJ8313@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas escribió:
> I don't even understand why we're interested in doing this. If the
> patches weren't important enough for someone to add them to the
> CommitFest wiki in October, why are we delaying the release to hunt
> for them in March?
The problem is not patches that were not committed, but rather loose
ends in patches that were.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-03-20 17:45:03 | Re: small but useful patches for text search |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-03-20 17:37:36 | Re: small but useful patches for text search |