| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-pkg-yum <pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Talha Bin Rizwan <talha(dot)rizwan(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Providing libpq explicitly |
| Date: | 2016-10-12 13:37:43 |
| Message-ID: | 59cc601c-64e9-b9a0-df79-a4d7800d5f8d@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-pkg-yum |
On 10/11/16 3:33 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 11 October 2016 at 15:13, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 21:59 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> >> What is an example of such a package?
>> >
>> > One of EDB packages. It uses functions exported by the libpq of 9.1+.
> I see, and you don't want to depend on postgresql9x-libs because you
> want to allow install against any postgresql9x-libs that installs a
> libpq.
Surely the RPM world has a standard or convention for this so we don't
have to make up something here? This is not the first shared library in
the world, after all
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais | 2016-10-21 14:15:44 | check_pgactivity 2.0 |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2016-10-11 07:33:45 | Re: Providing libpq explicitly |