| From: | Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-pkg-yum <pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Talha Bin Rizwan <talha(dot)rizwan(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Providing libpq explicitly |
| Date: | 2016-10-28 07:31:42 |
| Message-ID: | 1477639902.4136.120.camel@gunduz.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-pkg-yum |
Hi,
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 09:37 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > I see, and you don't want to depend on postgresql9x-libs because you
> > want to allow install against any postgresql9x-libs that installs a
> > libpq.
>
> Surely the RPM world has a standard or convention for this so we don't
> have to make up something here? This is not the first shared library in
> the world, after all
Noticing that we already provide postgresql-libs (versionless), I made a small
change in the spec file, and appended version number to that provides. It won't
break our packages, and then make EDB's package happy. So, no changes in
libpq.so part.
Thank you!
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim Gündüz | 2016-10-28 07:33:39 | Re: cstore_fdw package for pg9.6 |
| Previous Message | Devrim Gündüz | 2016-10-28 07:30:01 | Extending our SELinux support |