From: | Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
Cc: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Renan Alves Fonseca <renanfonseca(at)gmail(dot)com>, Florents Tselai <florents(dot)tselai(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: What's our minimum supported Python version? |
Date: | 2025-04-23 09:13:38 |
Message-ID: | 58731c4791688b72181681ca0adb6345951ff02d.camel@gunduz.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Wed, 2025-04-23 at 11:03 +0200, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
>
> I meant more in what ways do these things break? Since you're actually
> the one that's packaging them, I'd expect that you could make them
> depend on the python39 package and be mostly done.
You are right, our side is fixable. However many packages in the
upstream also depend on Psycopg. I don't want to create a Linux
distribution based on RHEL 8 built against Python 3.9 (or 3.1x) :-)
Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
Open Source Solution Architect, PostgreSQL Major Contributor
BlueSky: @devrim.gunduz.org , @gunduz.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Frédéric Yhuel | 2025-04-23 09:27:05 | Re: [BUG] temporary file usage report with extended protocol and unnamed portals |
Previous Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2025-04-23 09:11:32 | Re: What's our minimum supported Python version? |