Re: What's our minimum supported Python version?

From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Cc: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Renan Alves Fonseca <renanfonseca(at)gmail(dot)com>, Florents Tselai <florents(dot)tselai(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
Subject: Re: What's our minimum supported Python version?
Date: 2025-04-23 09:46:32
Message-ID: CAGECzQQjtsT4Yx=an1o8Gk4J33fmyRms8M7w25Srh8GnVmDY6A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 at 11:13, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> wrote:
> You are right, our side is fixable. However many packages in the
> upstream also depend on Psycopg. I don't want to create a Linux
> distribution based on RHEL 8 built against Python 3.9 (or 3.1x) :-)

I'm confused. The upstream RHEL8 repo depends on packages in pgdg???

Or are you saying that psycopg (and patroni) are not part of the
pgdg-repo, and instead part of the upstream-repo. And so that other
packages in pgdg that depend on upstream psycopg, would always need to
support python 3.6 (because that's what upstream psycopg uses).

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Borodin 2025-04-23 09:46:40 Re: [PATCH] dynahash: add memory allocation failure check
Previous Message Christoph Berg 2025-04-23 09:39:32 extension_control_path and "directory"