From: | Berend Tober <btober(at)computer(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, "drum(dot)lucas(at)gmail(dot)com" <drum(dot)lucas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Function PostgreSQL 9.2 |
Date: | 2016-05-05 00:00:29 |
Message-ID: | 572A8D1D.7030609@computer.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 2:57 PM, drum(dot)lucas(at)gmail(dot)com
> ...
>
> I would expect a minimum of respect from the members of this list,
> but seems you got none. If someone would need my help, I'd never
> insult him/her like you guys are doing.
>
> If my questions are too "child" for you, please, do not answer them.
> Ignore the emails... Isn't that simple?
>
> Talking to me like you guys are talking, is what I call "a ten-years
> old post".
>
>
> I'm not sure is this was meant to be a play on words but the original
> use of the phrase meant "a post written 10 years ago" - not that you are
> acting like a 10 year old.
My apologies for causing that misunderstanding. The phrase was
definitely not meant to imply the post of a 10-year old childs
intelligence (although I suppose it would have been impressive) ... I
was considerably older than that when I posted that example of compound
sequences ... 10-years ago.
>
> FWIW I didn't read any kind of "stealing of credit" in what you wrote -
> nor likely did most people. That particular observation came out of
> left field.
As I said, I might be over-sensitive on this ... being the original
author of the copied example implementation.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | dandl | 2016-05-05 00:04:53 | Re: Thoughts on "Love Your Database" |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2016-05-04 23:50:41 | Re: Debian and Postgres |