From: | "dandl" <david(at)andl(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | 'Pierre Chevalier Géologue' <pierrechevaliergeol(at)free(dot)fr> |
Cc: | "'pgsql-general'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Thoughts on "Love Your Database" |
Date: | 2016-05-05 00:04:53 |
Message-ID: | 006701d1a661$c1ad1780$45074680$@andl.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> From: Pierre Chevalier Géologue [mailto:pierrechevaliergeol(at)free(dot)fr]
> ...
> > Then I think you've seriously misunderstood. Most people can indeed
> >learn to write basic SQL queries, but those are
> >(obviously) not what I'm talking about.
> >
> > To write the business logic of a significant application entirely in
> >SQL requires PLSQL (or in other dialects, whatever passes for SQL/PSM).
> >It means writing an entire data access layer as a set of stored
> >procedures, with a substantial set of special functions, types,
> >triggers and so on. No beginner and few experts have the skills
> >required to do that in SQL, and then debug that code on the server.
>
> All right, I understand better now. I think I also totally missed your
> point, sorry...
> I'll give a look at andl.
I hope you do. Please feel free to contact me with any comments, suggestions, etc.
I have not completed the Postgres implementation -- probably another couple of weeks -- but in-memory and Sqlite are there.
Bonne chance!
Regards
David M Bennett FACS
Andl - A New Database Language - andl.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mike Sofen | 2016-05-05 00:12:00 | Re: Thoughts on "Love Your Database" |
Previous Message | Berend Tober | 2016-05-05 00:00:29 | Re: Function PostgreSQL 9.2 |