| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Steve Litt <slitt(at)troubleshooters(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: CoC V5 |
| Date: | 2016-01-13 21:39:36 |
| Message-ID: | 5696C418.5060803@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 01/13/2016 01:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Steve Litt <slitt(at)troubleshooters(dot)com> writes:
>> To me it's simple...
>> Disallow "You <something bad>"
>> Disallow "Your code <something bad>"
>> Encourage "It would be better if your code <something factual> because
>> <technological reason>."
>
> That's fine as practice, but I don't think we want to get anywhere near
> being that detailed in the CoC per se. If we start trying to write that
> sort of rule, the CoC will be multiple pages long and no one will read it.
> (I thought Kevin's last draft was already too long.)
+1
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-01-13 21:49:32 | Re: Data Packaging/Data Unpacking |
| Previous Message | oleg yusim | 2016-01-13 21:37:47 | Re: Data Packaging/Data Unpacking |