Re: WIP: CoC V5

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Steve Litt <slitt(at)troubleshooters(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: CoC V5
Date: 2016-01-13 21:27:06
Message-ID: 31038.1452720426@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Steve Litt <slitt(at)troubleshooters(dot)com> writes:
> To me it's simple...
> Disallow "You <something bad>"
> Disallow "Your code <something bad>"
> Encourage "It would be better if your code <something factual> because
> <technological reason>."

That's fine as practice, but I don't think we want to get anywhere near
being that detailed in the CoC per se. If we start trying to write that
sort of rule, the CoC will be multiple pages long and no one will read it.
(I thought Kevin's last draft was already too long.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2016-01-13 21:29:34 Re: Data Packaging/Data Unpacking
Previous Message John Wiencek 2016-01-13 21:25:14 Re: Synchronous replication