Re: Time to retire -performance?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Time to retire -performance?
Date: 2016-01-05 18:57:13
Message-ID: 568C1209.80701@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On 01/05/2016 10:39 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>>> I think it is time to retire this list. It gets very, very little traffic
>>>> and most people (by an extreme margin) just use -general or -hackers.
>>
>>> No way. There are two useful threads just on the last week. What would
>>> be the point?
>>
>> Indeed. There are some lists I think we possibly *could* retire,
>> like -interfaces, but -performance is reasonably popular.
>
> Actually I was thinking we could retire pgsql-php and redirect the
> almost non-existant traffic to -interfaces.

I would instead push them to php.net lists....

jD

>

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-01-05 19:08:14 Re: Time to retire -performance?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-01-05 18:56:49 Re: Time to retire -performance?