Re: Time to retire -performance?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Time to retire -performance?
Date: 2016-01-05 18:56:49
Message-ID: 568C11F1.7000804@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On 01/05/2016 10:32 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> I think it is time to retire this list. It gets very, very little traffic
>>> and most people (by an extreme margin) just use -general or -hackers.
>
>> No way. There are two useful threads just on the last week. What would
>> be the point?
>
> Indeed. There are some lists I think we possibly *could* retire,
> like -interfaces, but -performance is reasonably popular.

And -admin but -performance is reasonably popular by what metric?

http://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-performance/before/201601011713

Is pretty dry in comparison to say -general.

If we don't want to do it, cool. Just thinking maybe for the sake of
more eyes equals more possibility of response.

JD

>
> regards, tom lane
>

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-01-05 18:57:13 Re: Time to retire -performance?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-01-05 18:55:20 Re: Time to retire -performance?