Re: Time to retire -performance?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Time to retire -performance?
Date: 2016-01-05 18:39:39
Message-ID: 20160105183939.GA285839@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >> I think it is time to retire this list. It gets very, very little traffic
> >> and most people (by an extreme margin) just use -general or -hackers.
>
> > No way. There are two useful threads just on the last week. What would
> > be the point?
>
> Indeed. There are some lists I think we possibly *could* retire,
> like -interfaces, but -performance is reasonably popular.

Actually I was thinking we could retire pgsql-php and redirect the
almost non-existant traffic to -interfaces.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-01-05 18:55:20 Re: Time to retire -performance?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-01-05 18:32:39 Re: Time to retire -performance?