Re: [Pljava-dev] PL/Java build/installation rework ready to merge

From: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
To:
Subject: Re: [Pljava-dev] PL/Java build/installation rework ready to merge
Date: 2015-12-19 16:59:45
Message-ID: 56758D01.4020209@anastigmatix.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pljava-dev

On 12/18/15 23:58, Chapman Flack wrote:
>> advancing the version number in Maven to 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT and setting
>> the wheels in motion for a 1.5.0 release.
>
> ... and created PR 77, to change the version to 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT.

That's merged, and current documentation stamped 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT is live
at https://tada.github.io/pljava/

> I only have a short list of small things that (IMHO) ought to happen
> before turning -SNAPSHOT into -alpha1 (or even directly to a -beta,
> depending on whether it seems more important to have a lengthy alpha/
> beta period or to get a first-release-in-four-years into people's hands).

This is the list of remaining things that seem (to me) worth doing
before calling a 1.5.0 release ... mostly on the order of housekeeping:

- issue 75 - probably a real bug, probably not hard to fix.

- declare a source file encoding in the pom.xml; Maven warns if it isn't
set, and anyone _using_ PL/Java can now learn how to set it from our
documentation, so it's just a matter of taking our own medicine. I've
checked: UTF-8 covers all current source files.

- rename the packaging subproject to pljava-packaging as proposed on this
list http://lists.pgfoundry.org/pipermail/pljava-dev/2015/002355.html
All the other modules have a pljava- prefix and that seems good, as the
Maven repository namespace is org.postgresql, which has to be shared
with pgjdbc. (Will require chasing down references in the docs.)

- remove msvc-build-notes.txt (there's a whole MSVC section in the new docs)

- add notes to Deployer and install.sql that they are now unnecessary,
redirecting to the current installation docs.

- add support for 9.1+ CREATE EXTENSION so it is also
a workable way to intall. (No longer that much easier than installing
without it, but would have the benefit of familiarity.)

- Rototill the sources changing PGSQL_*_VER conditionals to use
PG_VERSION_NUM directly. It appeared in PG 8.2 and we are not trying
to support earlier versions. I earlier simplified the build process to
depend on PG_VERSION_NUM anyway, but found that #include order in some
files made that error prone. It will be safer and more readable to just
make the change throughout.

- Add COMMENT ON in the code that creates the sqlj schema and objects in it.
Not a big deal, but seems a bit unpolished to have no comments on those
objects.

- scour the wiki content for the most obviously obsolete info, version
references to PG 8.0.3 and Java 1.4, etc., which can be replaced with
links to the /one/ page of version targets in the new docs. Not the
time for a significant rewrite of anything in there, just removal of
obvious wrong info.

- same for the historical documents in the docs/ subdirectory.

- Release notes would be good. 1.4.3 came out in September 2011.
There's a lot to talk about since then.

- I propose some annotation keyword changes, as I think 1.5.0 will be
the first numbered release featuring the annotation support, so there
will probably never be a better time to improve some keywords if
appropriate. I'll compose a separate e-mail about that.

Comments and suggestions about this list of things welcome.

-Chap
_______________________________________________
Pljava-dev mailing list
Pljava-dev(at)lists(dot)pgfoundry(dot)org
http://lists.pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pljava-dev

In response to

Responses

Browse pljava-dev by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chapman Flack 2015-12-19 17:56:39 [Pljava-dev] annotation keyword changes before 1.5.0 (?)
Previous Message Chapman Flack 2015-12-19 04:58:24 Re: [Pljava-dev] PL/Java build/installation rework ready to merge