| From: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Oh, this is embarrassing: init file logic is still broken |
| Date: | 2015-06-26 22:47:24 |
| Message-ID: | 558DD67C.3020502@BlueTreble.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/25/15 12:51 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 06/25/2015 10:47 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>>> OK, this is pretty bad in its real performance effects. On a workload
>>> which is dominated by new connection creation, we've lost about 17%
>>> throughput.
>>
>> Mistakes happen, but this is the kind of regression that automated
>> performance testing could have caught. That's another area of testing
>> that needs considerable improvement IMV.
>
> Well, I have a pgbench test script for it now. If only I had some place
> to check it in ...
Well, there is https://github.com/slux/PostgreSQL-Performance-Farm; but
it hasn't been touched in 5 years. :(
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2015-06-26 22:47:48 | Re: UPSERT on partition |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-06-26 22:39:19 | Re: 9.5 release notes |