| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: UPSERT on partition |
| Date: | 2015-06-26 22:47:48 |
| Message-ID: | CANP8+jKaBpoHj68_tWB4USD+vjcMoHQ_BZcupdq2wwt6WjtKvA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 24 June 2015 at 15:05, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> How should we treat this problem for 9.5? If we want to fix this problem
> completely, probably we would need to make constraint_exclusion work with
> even UPSERT. Which sounds difficult to do at least for 9.5. Any other idea?
> Or we should just treat it as a limitation of UPSERT and add that document?
>
+1
There are many problems that cannot be resolved for 9.5.
UPSERT works fine with tables with BRIN indexes.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2015-06-26 23:13:31 | Re: [HACKERS] BUG #13473: VACUUM FREEZE mistakenly cancel standby sessions |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2015-06-26 22:47:24 | Re: Oh, this is embarrassing: init file logic is still broken |