Re: Oh, this is embarrassing: init file logic is still broken

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Oh, this is embarrassing: init file logic is still broken
Date: 2015-06-25 17:51:37
Message-ID: 558C3FA9.7070509@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06/25/2015 10:47 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> OK, this is pretty bad in its real performance effects. On a workload
>> which is dominated by new connection creation, we've lost about 17%
>> throughput.
>
> Mistakes happen, but this is the kind of regression that automated
> performance testing could have caught. That's another area of testing
> that needs considerable improvement IMV.

Well, I have a pgbench test script for it now. If only I had some place
to check it in ...

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-06-25 18:04:44 Re: Oh, this is embarrassing: init file logic is still broken
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-06-25 17:47:09 Re: Oh, this is embarrassing: init file logic is still broken