Re: Oh, this is embarrassing: init file logic is still broken

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Oh, this is embarrassing: init file logic is still broken
Date: 2015-06-25 17:47:09
Message-ID: CAM3SWZQ39CR5TT1BH3RQF6n6KPh8GUxKB4phak3UgvSYuZAvEw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> OK, this is pretty bad in its real performance effects. On a workload
> which is dominated by new connection creation, we've lost about 17%
> throughput.

Mistakes happen, but this is the kind of regression that automated
performance testing could have caught. That's another area of testing
that needs considerable improvement IMV.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2015-06-25 17:51:37 Re: Oh, this is embarrassing: init file logic is still broken
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2015-06-25 17:40:02 Re: Oh, this is embarrassing: init file logic is still broken