From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Rajeev rastogi <rajeev(dot)rastogi(at)huawei(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Standalone synchronous master |
Date: | 2014-01-11 00:48:31 |
Message-ID: | 52D094DF.6060604@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/10/2014 04:38 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Adrian,
>
> * Adrian Klaver (adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> On 01/10/2014 04:25 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>>> * Adrian Klaver (adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>>>> A) Change the existing sync mode to allow the master and standby
>>>> fall out of sync should a standby fall over.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure that anyone is argueing for this..
>>
>> Looks like here, unless I am really missing the point:
>
> Elsewhere in the thread, JD agreed that having it as an independent
> option was fine.
Yes. I am fine with an independent option.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc
"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary
act.", George Orwell
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2014-01-11 00:51:21 | Re: INSERT...ON DUPLICATE KEY LOCK FOR UPDATE |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2014-01-11 00:38:01 | Re: Standalone synchronous master |