Re: Standalone synchronous master

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Rajeev rastogi <rajeev(dot)rastogi(at)huawei(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Standalone synchronous master
Date: 2014-01-11 01:06:58
Message-ID: 52D09932.50601@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 01/10/2014 04:48 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> On 01/10/2014 04:38 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> Adrian,
>>
>> * Adrian Klaver (adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>>> On 01/10/2014 04:25 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>>>> * Adrian Klaver (adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>>>>> A) Change the existing sync mode to allow the master and standby
>>>>> fall out of sync should a standby fall over.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure that anyone is argueing for this..
>>>
>>> Looks like here, unless I am really missing the point:
>>
>> Elsewhere in the thread, JD agreed that having it as an independent
>> option was fine.
>
> Yes. I am fine with an independent option.

I missed that. What confused me and seems to be generally confusing is
the overloading of the term sync:

"Proposed behavior:

db01->sync->db02 "

In my mind if that is an independent option it should have different
name. I propose Schrödinger:)

>
> JD
>
>
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-01-11 01:15:53 Re: integrate pg_upgrade analyze_new_cluster.sh into vacuumdb
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-01-11 01:03:00 Re: Re: [bug fix] multibyte messages are displayed incorrectly on the client