Re: Standalone synchronous master

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Rajeev rastogi <rajeev(dot)rastogi(at)huawei(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Standalone synchronous master
Date: 2014-01-11 00:38:01
Message-ID: 20140111003801.GD2686@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Adrian,

* Adrian Klaver (adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On 01/10/2014 04:25 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >* Adrian Klaver (adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> >>A) Change the existing sync mode to allow the master and standby
> >>fall out of sync should a standby fall over.
> >
> >I'm not sure that anyone is argueing for this..
>
> Looks like here, unless I am really missing the point:

Elsewhere in the thread, JD agreed that having it as an independent
option was fine.

> Well you will not please everyone, just displease the least.

Well, sure, but we do generally try to reach concensus. :)

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2014-01-11 00:48:31 Re: Standalone synchronous master
Previous Message Noah Misch 2014-01-11 00:37:38 Re: [bug fix] multibyte messages are displayed incorrectly on the client