From: | Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication |
Date: | 2013-05-17 00:06:49 |
Message-ID: | 51957499.6050905@fuzzy.cz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi,
On 16.5.2013 16:46, Cuong Hoang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Our application is heavy write and IO utilisation has been the problem
> for us for a while. We've decided to use RAID 10 of 4x500GB Samsung 840
What does "heavy write" mean in your case? Does that mean a lot of small
transactions or few large ones?
What have you done to tune the server?
> Pro for the master server. I'm aware of write cache issue on SSDs in
> case of power loss. However, our hosting provider doesn't offer any
> other choices of SSD drives with supercapacitor. To minimise risk, we
> will also set up another RAID 10 SAS in streaming replication mode. For
> our application, a few seconds of data loss is acceptable.
Streaming replication allows zero data loss if used in synchronous mode.
> My question is, would corrupted data files on the primary server affect
> the streaming standby? In other word, is this setup acceptable in terms
> of minimising deficiency of SSDs?
It should be.
Have you considered using a UPS? That would make the SSDs about as
reliable as SATA/SAS drives - the UPS may fail, but so may a BBU unit on
the SAS controller.
Tomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Cuong Hoang | 2013-05-17 00:21:49 | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication |
Previous Message | Cuong Hoang | 2013-05-16 23:52:00 | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication |