Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication
Date: 2013-05-20 03:00:59
Message-ID: 519991EB.8010208@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 5/16/13 8:06 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Have you considered using a UPS? That would make the SSDs about as
> reliable as SATA/SAS drives - the UPS may fail, but so may a BBU unit on
> the SAS controller.

That's not true at all. Any decent RAID controller will have an option
to stop write-back caching when the battery is bad. Things will slow
badly when that happens, but there is zero data risk from a short-term
BBU failure. The only serious risk with a good BBU setup are that
you'll have a power failure lasting so long that the battery runs down
before the cache can be flushed to disk.

--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2013-05-20 03:10:08 Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication
Previous Message Greg Smith 2013-05-20 02:55:28 Re: Deleting Rows From Large Tables