From: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Need solution for weekly database "snapshot" |
Date: | 2013-04-22 17:59:28 |
Message-ID: | 51757A80.3000803@hogranch.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 4/22/2013 10:05 AM, Moshe Jacobson wrote:
>
> Setup a slave.
>
> Not bad, but the transaction logs would fill up the file system.
> Besides, it would not be worth it to set up a whole database cluster
> just for this purpose.
>
> Any alternatives?
if your file system supports it (ZFS, for instance), you /could/ take a
volume snapshot/clone, and then mount that and run a separate instance
of PostgreSQL on it, using a different port number. when done with your
reports, you'd drop that instance and snapshot.
we run a separate server (hardware and database) for our reporting
systems as their workload is heavier than the realtime transaction system.
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alfonso Afonso | 2013-04-22 18:36:20 | Re: using text search |
Previous Message | Christophe Pettus | 2013-04-22 17:41:13 | Re: Need solution for weekly database "snapshot" |