Re: 9.2.3 upgrade reduced pgbench performance by 60%

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA)" <bnicholson(at)hp(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.2.3 upgrade reduced pgbench performance by 60%
Date: 2013-03-27 22:52:10
Message-ID: 5153781A.2030704@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


>
> I saw some similar results comparing 9.0 and 9.2 pgbench tests. My tests were on a VM, but on a dedicate host/hardware with no other VM's running on it to minimize variables. I didn't have a lot of time to dig into it, but I do recall seeing more lock contention on updates on the 9.2 instance though.

Ah, good point. At that scale, Colin's test is mostly a contention
test. There's something there worth investigating, but it's not a
realistic use case.

Colin, please try your pgbench tests with -s 100.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marty Frasier 2013-03-28 15:59:05 how to help the planner
Previous Message Vasilis Ventirozos 2013-03-27 14:15:30 Re: Reg: Slow query