From: | "Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA)" <bnicholson(at)hp(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.2.3 upgrade reduced pgbench performance by 60% |
Date: | 2013-03-26 20:05:39 |
Message-ID: | EC55DC235432104F8255702A8D7344D941836A29@G4W3302.americas.hpqcorp.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-
> performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Josh Berkus
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 4:34 PM
> To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [PERFORM] 9.2.3 upgrade reduced pgbench performance by
> 60%
>
>
> > The Linux server is on a cloud and has 4GB RAM and 2 CPUs and the same
> > server is running both master and slave (these are separate in
> > production). If you'd like any more details please ask. Here are the
> > pgbench results:
>
> Presumably you created a new cloud server for 9.2, yes? I'd guess that the
> difference is between the two cloud servers. Try testing, for example,
> bonnie++ on the two servers.
>
I saw some similar results comparing 9.0 and 9.2 pgbench tests. My tests were on a VM, but on a dedicate host/hardware with no other VM's running on it to minimize variables. I didn't have a lot of time to dig into it, but I do recall seeing more lock contention on updates on the 9.2 instance though.
Brad.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Prakash Chinnakannan | 2013-03-27 14:04:53 | Reg: Slow query |
Previous Message | Shaun Thomas | 2013-03-26 18:59:50 | Re: [OT] linux 3.10 kernel will improve ipc,sysv semaphore scalability |