From: | Vasilis Ventirozos <v(dot)ventirozos(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Reg: Slow query |
Date: | 2013-03-27 14:15:30 |
Message-ID: | CAF8jcqoxqfD=mxF4yiwrdXN_vq9DnPinQ21HT_TyS2Fq+kHA3Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hello,
This definitively doesn't look like something that has to do with postgres
settings, can you show us the statement and the explain plan ?
Also , have you checked pg_stat_activity to monitor what is running at the
same time when the delay occurs ?
It kinda looks like a lock to me.
Vasilis Ventirozos
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Prakash Chinnakannan <
prakash(dot)chinnakannan(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Currently, I'm working on a performance issue with a query which takes
> around ~30 sec to complete. This happens only, when there are more
> activity going around same table. The same query completes with in a
> second when there are no activity on that table.
>
> Tried taking EXPLAIN ANALYZE output and analyze it, since it completes
> with in a second, there are no blockers in it.
>
> Is there any way to see whether postgress settings creates the
> problem? which could be related to memory, locks or I/O etc..
>
> Thanks for your help.
> --Prakash
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-03-27 22:52:10 | Re: 9.2.3 upgrade reduced pgbench performance by 60% |
Previous Message | Prakash Chinnakannan | 2013-03-27 14:04:53 | Reg: Slow query |