From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Materialized View patch broke pg_dump |
Date: | 2013-03-11 16:59:30 |
Message-ID: | 513E0D72.2090605@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/11/2013 12:30 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:43 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> On 03/11/2013 10:43 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/06/2013 10:55 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>>>> Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Looking into this issue, it seems the version check in getTables() of
>>>>> pg_dump.c
>>>>> is wrong. Shouldn't the check be
>>>>>
>>>>> if (fout->remoteVersion >= 90300)
>>>>> {
>>>>>
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> since this is where pg_relation_is_scannable() is introduced?
>>>> Fixed.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the report!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I noticed this morning that I am still getting failures on 9.0, 9.1 and
>>> 9.2 which cause my cross-version upgrade testing to fail for git tip. For
>>> all I know this might apply to all back branches, but these are the only
>>> ones tested for upgrade, so that's all I can report on reliably.
>>>
>>> I'm chasing it up to find out exactly what's going on, but figured some
>>> extra eyeballs would help.
>>>
>>>
>> The problem is that pg_dump is sending an empty query in versions less than
>> 9.3, and choking on that. Suggested fix attached - there's really no reason
>> to be doing anything re mat views in versions < 9.3.
> This is the same problem that I reported in another thread.
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHGQGwH+4vtyq==L6HRuPxTggfqrnLf0mWj75BfisOske28gMA@mail.gmail.com
>
>
Oh, I missed that. Yes, either of these would work.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-03-11 17:01:12 | Re: postgres_fdw vs data formatting GUCs (was Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables) |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-03-11 16:55:34 | Re: transforms |