Re: Materialized View patch broke pg_dump

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Materialized View patch broke pg_dump
Date: 2013-03-11 16:30:15
Message-ID: CAHGQGwH+WX+sRFzzQLrNKvWeGoUnJ6inbyf2oAejdyPSduE=rA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:43 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
> On 03/11/2013 10:43 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 03/06/2013 10:55 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>>>
>>> Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Looking into this issue, it seems the version check in getTables() of
>>>> pg_dump.c
>>>> is wrong. Shouldn't the check be
>>>>
>>>> if (fout->remoteVersion >= 90300)
>>>> {
>>>>
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> since this is where pg_relation_is_scannable() is introduced?
>>>
>>> Fixed.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the report!
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I noticed this morning that I am still getting failures on 9.0, 9.1 and
>> 9.2 which cause my cross-version upgrade testing to fail for git tip. For
>> all I know this might apply to all back branches, but these are the only
>> ones tested for upgrade, so that's all I can report on reliably.
>>
>> I'm chasing it up to find out exactly what's going on, but figured some
>> extra eyeballs would help.
>>
>>
>
> The problem is that pg_dump is sending an empty query in versions less than
> 9.3, and choking on that. Suggested fix attached - there's really no reason
> to be doing anything re mat views in versions < 9.3.

This is the same problem that I reported in another thread.
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHGQGwH+4vtyq==L6HRuPxTggfqrnLf0mWj75BfisOske28gMA@mail.gmail.com

The patch looks good to me.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2013-03-11 16:40:43 Re: postgres_fdw vs data formatting GUCs (was Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-03-11 16:01:01 Re: matview join view error