Re: HA options

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: HA options
Date: 2012-01-16 22:00:20
Message-ID: 4F149DF4.7080706@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 01/16/12 1:34 PM, Tim Uckun wrote:
> the servers will be virtual on either rackspace or amazon so that's
> possibly a complication.

virtual servers tend to have lousy storage performance, for what thats
worth. the actual physical resources are being shared by who knows what
other workloads, and they tend to be higher latency than direct-attach
storage, or proper SAN.

--
john r pierce N 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast

In response to

  • HA options at 2012-01-16 21:34:54 from Tim Uckun

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Uckun 2012-01-16 22:04:14 Re: HA options
Previous Message Tim Uckun 2012-01-16 21:53:20 Re: HA options