| From: | Tim Uckun <timuckun(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Morton <davidmorton(at)xtra(dot)co(dot)nz> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: HA options |
| Date: | 2012-01-16 21:53:20 |
| Message-ID: | CAGuHJrMYW0qQj4-ZvBnXGHiM6xHPFJMn+ak4jMTKSLGLmsWaXA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:47 AM, David Morton <davidmorton(at)xtra(dot)co(dot)nz> wrote:
> Is shared storage an option for you ? We've had a fairly pleasant experience
> with shared storage partnered up with SLES and its HAE (high availability
> extension) suite using a Pacemaker cluster for resource control. On top of
> this we replicate to a hot standby server offsite, however used for
> reporting and not failover for us.
>
No unfortunately shared storage is not an option. It would be awesome
if Amazon allowed you to attach the same EBS to multiple instances but
alas they don't. Rackspace offers a SAN but that's too costly for us.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John R Pierce | 2012-01-16 22:00:20 | Re: HA options |
| Previous Message | David Morton | 2012-01-16 21:47:18 | Re: HA options |