Re: HA options

From: Tim Uckun <timuckun(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: HA options
Date: 2012-01-16 22:04:14
Message-ID: CAGuHJrOC1Ome55=bK12m7h2wROTGea0sQC7GfWHntTwm-CtNyw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>
> virtual servers tend to have lousy storage performance, for what thats
> worth.  the actual physical resources are being shared by who knows what
> other workloads, and they tend to be higher latency than direct-attach
> storage, or proper SAN.

I realize that. Eventually we might have to go to physical machines
but for now we are using virtual servers and I have to make it work
within that structure.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2012-01-16 22:09:04 Re: HA options
Previous Message John R Pierce 2012-01-16 22:00:20 Re: HA options