Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...

From: Mladen Gogala <mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com>
To: "jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Maciek Sakrejda <msakrejda(at)truviso(dot)com>, "sthomas(at)peak6(dot)com" <sthomas(at)peak6(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Date: 2011-02-04 00:13:17
Message-ID: 4D4B449D.6080402@vmsinfo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 18:33 -0500, Mladen Gogala wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Exactly what we don't want.
>>>
>>>
>> Who is "we"?
>>
>
> The majority of long term hackers.
>
>
If that is so, I don't see "world domination" in the future, exactly
the opposite. Database whose creators don't trust their users cannot
count on the very bright future. All other databases do have that
feature. I must say, this debate gave me a good deal of stuff to think
about.

--

Mladen Gogala
Sr. Oracle DBA
1500 Broadway
New York, NY 10036
(212) 329-5251
http://www.vmsinfo.com
The Leader in Integrated Media Intelligence Solutions

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeremy Harris 2011-02-04 00:29:22 Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-02-04 00:08:21 Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeremy Harris 2011-02-04 00:29:22 Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-02-04 00:08:21 Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...