Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Mladen Gogala <mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Maciek Sakrejda <msakrejda(at)truviso(dot)com>, "sthomas(at)peak6(dot)com" <sthomas(at)peak6(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Date: 2011-02-03 23:56:57
Message-ID: 1296777417.18411.97.camel@jd-desktop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 18:33 -0500, Mladen Gogala wrote:
>
> >
> > Exactly what we don't want.
> >
> Who is "we"?

The majority of long term hackers.

--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig James 2011-02-04 00:08:10 Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Previous Message Noah Misch 2011-02-03 23:36:24 Re: Per-column collation, the finale

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig James 2011-02-04 00:08:10 Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Previous Message Mladen Gogala 2011-02-03 23:33:21 Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...