| From: | Shaun Thomas <sthomas(at)peak6(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... |
| Date: | 2011-02-04 00:30:50 |
| Message-ID: | D247E79EFD801E40A9449A9724F6295B4C5F5FBB@spswchi6mail1.peak6.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
> All other databases do have that feature. I must say, this
> debate gave me a good deal of stuff to think about.
Aaaaand, I think we're done here. The idea that the lack of hints will kill
PostgreSQL is already demonstrably false. This is sounding more and
more like a petulant tantrum.
Folks, I apologize for ever taking part in this conversation and contributing
to the loss of signal to noise. Please forgive me.
--
Shaun Thomas
Peak6 | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 800 | Chicago, IL 60604
312-676-8870
sthomas(at)peak6(dot)com
______________________________________________
See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer.php
for terms and conditions related to this email
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | david | 2011-02-04 00:39:12 | Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... |
| Previous Message | Jeremy Harris | 2011-02-04 00:29:22 | Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | david | 2011-02-04 00:39:12 | Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... |
| Previous Message | Jeremy Harris | 2011-02-04 00:29:22 | Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... |