| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mladen Gogala <mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Maciek Sakrejda <msakrejda(at)truviso(dot)com>, sthomas(at)peak6(dot)com, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... |
| Date: | 2011-02-03 23:00:37 |
| Message-ID: | 4D4B3395.6010007@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
> I don't want to insult anybody but the whole thing does look strange.
> Maybe we can agree to remove that ridiculous "we don't want hints" note
> from Postgresql wiki? That would make it look less like , hmph,
> philosophical issue and more "not yet implemented" issue, especially if
> we have in mind that hints are already here, in the form of
> "enable_<method>" switches.
Link? There's a lot of stuff on the wiki.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-02-03 23:00:50 | Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... |
| Previous Message | Michael Banck | 2011-02-03 22:55:10 | Re: Spread checkpoint sync |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-02-03 23:00:50 | Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2011-02-03 22:56:57 | Re: getting the most of out multi-core systems for repeated complex SELECT statements |