Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...

From: Mladen Gogala <mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com>
To: Maciek Sakrejda <msakrejda(at)truviso(dot)com>
Cc: "sthomas(at)peak6(dot)com" <sthomas(at)peak6(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Date: 2011-02-03 22:39:06
Message-ID: 4D4B2E8A.7010402@vmsinfo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Maciek Sakrejda wrote:
>> The hints are there because they are definitely needed. Yet, there is a
>> religious zeal and a fatwa against them.
>>
>
> The opposition is philosophical, not "religious". There is no "fatwa".
> If you want a serious discussion, avoid inflammatory terms.
>
>
>
I don't want to insult anybody but the whole thing does look strange.
Maybe we can agree to remove that ridiculous "we don't want hints" note
from Postgresql wiki? That would make it look less like , hmph,
philosophical issue and more "not yet implemented" issue, especially if
we have in mind that hints are already here, in the form of
"enable_<method>" switches.

--

Mladen Gogala
Sr. Oracle DBA
1500 Broadway
New York, NY 10036
(212) 329-5251
http://www.vmsinfo.com
The Leader in Integrated Media Intelligence Solutions

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mladen Gogala 2011-02-03 22:40:17 Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Previous Message Greg Smith 2011-02-03 22:35:12 Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mladen Gogala 2011-02-03 22:40:17 Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Previous Message Greg Smith 2011-02-03 22:35:12 Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...