| From: | Michael Banck <mbanck(at)debian(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Spread checkpoint sync |
| Date: | 2011-02-03 22:55:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20110203225510.GA29855@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 05:47:24AM -0500, Greg Smith wrote:
> For example, the pre-release Squeeze numbers we're seeing are awful so
> far, but it's not really done yet either.
Unfortunately, it does not look like Debian squeeze will change any more
(or has changed much since your post) at this point, except for maybe
further stable kernel updates.
Which file system did you see those awful numbers on and could you maybe
go into some more detail?
Thanks,
Michael
--
<marco_g> I did send an email to propose multithreading to
grub-devel on the first of april.
<marco_g> Unfortunately everyone thought I was serious ;-)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2011-02-03 23:00:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... |
| Previous Message | Mladen Gogala | 2011-02-03 22:40:17 | Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... |