From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Complier warnings on mingw gcc 4.5.0 |
Date: | 2010-12-16 02:20:25 |
Message-ID: | 4D097769.6030905@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/15/2010 08:46 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> I believe #2 is in fact necessary. When I tried just #1 before it
>> failed. What's the best way to do #2 cleanly?
> We can't change the meaning of HAVE_INT_OPTRESET because that would
> break the declaration logic in getopt.c. I'm thinking we have to
> complicate the #if logic in postmaster.c and postgres.c.
I agree.
> Will look
> into it as soon as I get done with the contrib/seg patch (ie in an
> hour or so).
>
>
OK. I'll test any patch you post ASAP.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-12-16 04:53:02 | Re: Complier warnings on mingw gcc 4.5.0 |
Previous Message | Daniele Varrazzo | 2010-12-16 01:51:07 | Re: [HACKERS] getting composite types info from libpq |